Emory University
Bookmark and Share

No Patient Left Behind: Confronting Health Disparities

Why are some individuals more likely to develop cancer or to develop a more aggressive form of cancer? Why do some people not get the care they need, when they need it? Winship clinicians and researchers confront such disparities daily - and are working to understand and change them.

By Sylvia Wrobel | Illustration by Brian Stauffer

Story Photo

Risk Disparity

Genetic research is a key to understanding how either race or ethnicity affect the incidence of different cancers and how these factors may contribute to different responses to the same treatments. Multiple myeloma, a blood cancer of the immune system's plasma cells, occurs two to three times more often in African Americans than in Caucasians. Finding out why could lead to better therapies for all. Winship researchers couldn’t do it without people like Veronica Reynolds.

In her mid-50s, the busy realtor developed severe pain. She asked herself if she had strained her back, driving back and forth showing houses or picking up grandchildren? She told herself it would go away. It got worse. One doctor told her she looked too well to hurt as much as she claimed. Another believed her but his pills barely helped. After two years, she feared her heart would stop from pain. At Grady Memorial Hospital, imaging revealed fractured bones, due to bone destruction. Other tests provided the multiple myeloma diagnosis – and led Reynolds to Leon Bernal-Mizrachi, a Winship hematologist/oncologist who sees patients at Grady.

Reynolds credits God for sending her to Bernal-Mizrachi and to Jonathan Kaufman, director of Winship's ambulatory infusion center, who oversaw her stem cell transplant following high dose chemotherapy. She credits herself for following the complex treatment regimens. And she's "ecstatic," she adds, about being part of her doctors' research. "I hope I have enough fight in me to live to see it help many people like me."

Reynolds – and her genes – are part of a massive multiinstitutional study to sequence the entire genome (more than three billion DNA base pairs) of 1,049 African Americans with multiple myeloma and another 7,084 without the disease. The Winship component, headed by Sagar Lonial, Bernal-Mizrachi, and Ajay Nooka, has gathered almost a third of the study’s participants, thanks to the researchers' commitment and Georgia's high African-American population. Although still in process, the study is already producing valuable insights. Winship physicians routinely take tissue cells from multiple myeloma patients, looking for genetic variants that indicate who is at higher risk of relapse. They hope this new study will help identify why this disease occurs more frequently among African Americans and determine if there are treatments that may be specific to these patients.

Winship researchers also are looking at genetic differences in another blood cancer, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to Caucasians, African Americans have a lower incidence of DLBCL – but are more often younger, with more advanced disease, and a lower chance of surviving. A multi-institutional study headed by Winship hematologist/oncologist Christopher R. Flowers, director of the Emory Lymphoma Program, is finding subtle genetic differences, depending on race, in DLBCL subtypes. This builds on earlier work by Bernal-Mizrachi's team, which demonstrated that different subtypes have different signaling pathways (cells that activate cell division and other functions). Abnormal activation can lead to cancer and cancer cell growth. The long-term goal is to develop new drugs to block different pathways. But the Bernal-Mizrachi team already has demonstrated that using different existing drugs, depending on patients’ subtypes, itself positively changes outcomes.

In fact, Bernal-Mizrachi says new drugs are changing how clinicians view racial disparities. For years, African-American multiple myeloma patients were believed to have poorer outcomes after autologous stem cell transplants (transplants using the patient’s own stem cells), like that given Reynolds. But a recent Emory study of transplants from 2006 to 2012 showed newer maintenance drugs had improved outcomes for both blacks and whites. In fact, preliminary results indicate African Americans may actually have longer progression-free survival, suggesting a difference in response to the new drugs, something which Nooka, Kaufman, Lonial, and Bernal-Mizrachi are examining.

Winship researchers are aggressively investigating the genetic disparities of several other cancers, including prostate and triple-negative breast cancers. They also are asking whether behavioral or environmental factors play a role. The large multiple myeloma study found that being obese at 20 or younger increased the risk of developing the cancer and of developing it at a younger age. Lonial's team is investigating whether rural Georgia's high rate of myeloma is related to agricultural or pesticide exposure. Flowers' team looked at the relationship between the dramatic rise in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and exposure to benzene, a chemical in plastics, detergents, and pesticides. The researchers found significantly more cases near manufacturing facilities that release benzene into the environment, with a 0.31 percent decrease in risk for every extra mile of distance from benzene release sites.


Care Disparity

"At Winship, we use fundamental science to get at the root causes of cancer, including cancer disparities. We then go to the next step, looking at disparities in why some groups get less or later care," says Walter J. Curran, Jr., executive director of Winship. "Our faculty are dedicated to reducing the burden of cancer for all Georgians, and our work exploring the cause of disparities in patient outcomes will improve the lives of all cancer survivors."

Winship clinicians working with patients from different populations and Winship researchers working with population-based studies in cancer prevention and control are finding that race and ethnicity have less to do with disparities in health care than do economics and knowledge gaps or misconceptions. Change those, they say, and you can do a lot to erase some of the worst disparities.

Take, for example, cervical cancer, where disparities in incidence and outcome abound, nationwide and among the patients seen by Winship gynecologist Lisa Flowers, who is based at Grady. Those disparities are all the more troubling, says Flowers, because cervical cancer is completely preventable and is highly curable when detected early.

As with many diseases, minorities and other underserved populations suffer most. Nationally, new cases of cervical cancer are 65 percent higher among Latinas and 45 percent higher among African Americans than among white women (except those in Appalachia and some other rural areas). But mortality is markedly higher for African Americans.

Higher rates of new cases for Latinas occur in part, says Flowers, because many Latinas are newcomers to the U.S. and are less likely to have had access to screening. African Americans are screened at a higher rate, surpassing both Latinas and white women. They more often die, she says, in large part due to less follow-up after abnormal test results.

Follow-up care can be challenging. A woman has to find a doctor and pay for colposcopy (examination of the cervix) to see if the abnormal cells found by a Pap test (the standard screening for cervical cancer) are pre-cancerous. She can receive aid from the state for treatment only if she has a diagnosis of high grade precancerous cells or cancer. If, that is, she is a legal resident or citizen of the U.S.

If Latinas can surmount problems such as money, transportation, and citizenship, they usually take the next step, says Flowers. For some, however, and for many low-income African Americans she sees at Grady, myths create another barrier to screening or follow-up. Myths like I don’t need screening because women who get cervical cancer are promiscuous and I’m not. Most people unknowingly have the sexually-transmitted human papilloma virus (HPV) at some time in life, but in most cases it goes away on its own without leading to cervical cancer. I once had a test so I know I’m not at risk. No, half of patients have not had a Pap test in the past three years, as is recommended. Abnormal results? Then why bother, I’m doomed. Most abnormal Pap tests turn out not to be cancer, but they paralyze some women with fear. They refuse to think about follow-up or leave it in God's hands.

Director of Colposcopy at Emory's School of Medicine, Flowers has written extensively about the impact of these myths – and how to combat them with education and community outreach. Bilingual, daughter of a Cuban-born mother and African-American father, she is founder and medical director of the non-profit Spirit Foundation that focuses on preventing cervical cancer in medically underserved women in the U.S. and Spanish speaking countries. She's extremely active in Con Amor Aprendemos (with love we learn), a program to provide Hispanic/Latino couples information about cervical cancer prevention, and has helped adapt the program for African Americans, working with metro churches
to present it.

"The bottom line," says Curran, "is that biology and socioeconomic issues can be intertwined in the development of cancers and the delivery of appropriate healthcare. Our Winship faculty are committed to confronting both issues, to the benefit of our patients."

Patient Veronica Reynolds would agree. She says, "My life is a walking testament to what these researchers are doing. Thanks to them, to Dr. Bernal-Mizrachi and my other doctors, I can say I'm here, I'm standing. I'll never give up while they are pushing so hard to help."

Email the editor